John Walton: Origins of Genesis 1-3 (Logos Mobile Ed) – My Digital Seminary

Review by Lindsay Kennedy:

A number of months ago I reviewed Logos Mobile Education by way of John Walton’s Old Testament Genres course. This was part of a bundle with his Origins of Genesis 1-3 course, so I thought it high time to review it! Since much of what I already said applies to this course, I will simply summarize some of the content.

Origins of Genesis 1-3

In this 4-hour course, John Walton presents an understanding of Genesis 1-3 that is informed by the worldview of the Ancient Near East. That is, he believes his presentation is closer to how it would have been “read”. Genesis 1-3 are among the most familiar chapters of the Bible to most Christians, but the advances in knowledge of the ancient Israelite worldview, and those of the surrounding culture have not yet filtered down to the church. As an expert in the Ancient Near East, an evangelical, and an entertaining and likeable speaker, John Walton seems like the man of the hour.

The basic proposal is that the church reads the text with too much “baggage” of the creation/evolution debate. Instead, we need to read it as an ancient text. Instead of coming to the text with our modern questions, we must ask the questions the texts leads us to ask. Instead of reading the text through modern eyes with modern scientific concepts of “reality”, we need to see the world through the eyes of the ancient Israelites. How did they conceive of the world?

Walton Genesis Outline.pngTo achieve this end, Walton highlights the differences in how the world is conceived. Probably the most significant (and controversial) point Walton makes is that the ancients were less concerned with being than function.

Or to put it in other words, Genesis 1 is not a house story but a home story. The ancients were less concerned with the story of how the house (i.e. cosmos) was built, but more about how it was made into a home. This means that the Bible is less concerned with answering our modern scientific “how” questions, but wants to tell us “why”. For example, what does it mean that mankind was formed from dust? Is that how God made mankind? Is dust moldable? Are we composed of dust? Or is it rather telling us that we are frail? Or another example: is Eve’s creation telling us how woman was made? Or is it answering a why question by telling us that because Eve comes from the side of Adam, she is equal to him.

Please follow the link to continue reading Lindsay’s review!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s