Scrutinizing the Case for Q: Ancient Compositional Practices


The Jesus Memoirs

For the view that the Two Source Theory accords with how ancient writers used their sources in the Graeco-Roman world, see Robert Allen Derrenbacker, Ancient Compositional Practices and the Synoptic Problem (BETL 186; Leuven: Peeters, 2005; cf. his PhD thesis at the University of Toronto) and F. Gerald Downing, “Disagreements of Each Evangelist with the Minor Close Agreements of the Other Two” ETL 80 (2004): 445–469. In working with scrolls, they insist that it was impractical to check more than one at a time or randomly move backwards and forwards through a scroll. Thus, ancient writers preferred to work with one source at a time rather than attempt complex harmonizations of multiple sources at the micro-level. The theory works best with how Luke alternates between citing Mark and Q in whole blocks (Q material in Luke 6:20-8:3; 9:1-18:14). It is more difficult to explain the ways Luke and Matthew conflate…

View original post 428 more words

Published by Vincent S Artale Jr

Biblical studies, Health and Nutrition, Biology, Fitness, Hiking, Reading. Re-blogging doesn't equal agreement.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: