Book Review: Revelation (TNTC), Ian Paul


spoiledmilks

Ian Paul, adjunct professor of New Testament at Fuller Theological Seminary, offers a succinct, though substantial, read of Revelation. He provides a 56-page introduction, covering topics such as: Revelation’s genre, how do we read Revelation, did John actually have a vision?, how do we understand Revelations use of imagery, numbers, and the OT. He ends the introduction with a look at John’s structure, key themes, and the different approaches to Revelation.

Paul briefly explains the four main approaches commentators use to read Revelation: idealist, futurist, historical and preterist, as well as explaining the four eschatological positions: premillennialism, amillennialism, postmillennialism, and dispensational premillennialism. Paul notes that these eight possible positions are actually conclusions (p51) about how the book should be interpreted. Paul reads Revelation closely to understand what it actually says rather than him being driven by theological assumptions. Instead of reading and thinking, “This text must mean this…

View original post 1,398 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s